PRFR numbers for tax estimates given incorrectly

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

In his comment about my Letter to the Editor on August 13, 2014, James Hodl still appears to be confused about how to calculate the expected taxes for the proposed Pinal Rural Fire Rescue and Medical District (PRFR&MD). The most accurate approach is what I outlined using the rightmost column of the impact statement for each parcel. That is, take the Primary Net Assessed value given in this column and multiple it by 3%. The correctness of this calculation of taxes that I presented verbally and in a handout was confirmed in an email to me on 8/11/14 from Steve Turcotte in which he stated “You are correct in your calculations using the figures on the far right column of the spreadsheet as your base assessment.”

Supervisor Todd House suggested that the Full Cash Value could be used to calculate the potential taxes if it were multiplied by 10% to give an estimate of the Primary Net Assessed Value. This amount could then be multiplied by 3% to give the tax amount. First, the Primary Net Assessed values I used were already multiplied by percentage rate making a second multiplication by 10% as Todd House suggested incorrect. Second, his approach is more approximate than what I recommended (the actual rate on our two parcels is not 10% but 10.6% and 16.0%) and these differences are reflected in the value in the rightmost column.

Unfortunately, in addition the examples in the PRFR&MD impact statement incorrectly suggest using the Secondary Net Assessment value (second column from the right), a value which has already been multiplied by around 10%. For their method, they should instead suggest using the Full Cash Value (fourth column from the right), which is about ten times higher, before first multiplying by 10%, and then by 3%.

In other words, the numbers that I gave for the amount of property taxes and the potential increase in the property taxes of 32.4% are correct. Todd House was wrong in his estimate of what the taxes would be and fittingly at the Board of Supervisors meeting he would not guarantee to me that his claim that the taxes would be 1/10 of what I had calculated. It should be clear that the increase in taxes from the proposed district will be substantial and will increase our property taxes by nearly one-third. The grossly incorrect calculations of property taxes suggested by the supporters of PRFR&MD makes me concerned that many other statements by them might also be incorrect.

/s/ Phil Hedrick

Winkelman

Editor’s Note: Copper Area News writer James Hodl used the property tax estimates that were presented to the Pinal County Board of Supervisors by Pinal Rural Fire Rescue because they were part of the official record of the meeting and the impact statement. The group has a year to gather signatures in favor of the new district and it’s voices like Mr. Hedrick’s that will provide counterpoints to the issue. We at Copper Area News appreciate differing viewpoints and invite others to participate in the community discussion. ~JRC

Staff (3730 Posts)

There are news or informational items frequently written by staff or submitted to the Copper Basin News, San Manuel Miner, Superior Sun, Pinal Nugget or Oracle Towne Crier for inclusion in our print or digital products. These items are not credited with an author.


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather
Facebooktwitterby feather

Comments are closed.

  • Additional Stories

    JP Court Redistricting?

    January 17th, 2017
    by

      There have been many questions in the Copper Corridor regarding the Superior Court’s possible realignment of JP Courts in […]


    Reader speaks out to local youth

    January 10th, 2017
    by

      To the young individuals and to those who are at the lowest point in their lives,   Having a […]


    Pinal County treasurer says farewell at her retirement

    January 3rd, 2017
    by

      When I started working in the Pinal  County Treasurer’s office 25 years ago, I had no idea it would […]


    San Manuel resident calls attention to wildcat dumpers, illegal trappers in desert near town

    December 22nd, 2016
    by

    My wife and I walk our three dogs in the desert area behind the churches, west of the village, twice […]


  • Additional Stories

    Dry Heat: Artificial Intelligence

    December 22nd, 2016
    by

    Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) is the intelligence exhibited by machines or computers. A.I. is slowly taking over our world. The science […]


    Mayor’s Minute: Santa Needs Our Help

    December 7th, 2016
    by

    It is beginning to look a lot like Christmas here in Superior.  Our public works crew was able to refurbish […]


    Kearny Residents Urged to Attend 10-Year Planning Meeting Dec. 5

    November 30th, 2016
    by

    By Mayor Sam Hosler, Town of Kearny   I hope that many of us will keep 6 p.m. of Monday, […]


    Superior dog owners, please contain and leash your dogs

    November 23rd, 2016
    by

      I am relatively new to Superior, and it’s an eye opener that so many people just let their dogs […]


  • Copperarea

  • [Advertisement.]
  • [Advertisement.]
  • [Advertisement.]
  • Southeast Valley Ledger

  • Arizona Headlines & Current Weather