PRFR numbers for tax estimates given incorrectly

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

In his comment about my Letter to the Editor on August 13, 2014, James Hodl still appears to be confused about how to calculate the expected taxes for the proposed Pinal Rural Fire Rescue and Medical District (PRFR&MD). The most accurate approach is what I outlined using the rightmost column of the impact statement for each parcel. That is, take the Primary Net Assessed value given in this column and multiple it by 3%. The correctness of this calculation of taxes that I presented verbally and in a handout was confirmed in an email to me on 8/11/14 from Steve Turcotte in which he stated “You are correct in your calculations using the figures on the far right column of the spreadsheet as your base assessment.”

Supervisor Todd House suggested that the Full Cash Value could be used to calculate the potential taxes if it were multiplied by 10% to give an estimate of the Primary Net Assessed Value. This amount could then be multiplied by 3% to give the tax amount. First, the Primary Net Assessed values I used were already multiplied by percentage rate making a second multiplication by 10% as Todd House suggested incorrect. Second, his approach is more approximate than what I recommended (the actual rate on our two parcels is not 10% but 10.6% and 16.0%) and these differences are reflected in the value in the rightmost column.

Unfortunately, in addition the examples in the PRFR&MD impact statement incorrectly suggest using the Secondary Net Assessment value (second column from the right), a value which has already been multiplied by around 10%. For their method, they should instead suggest using the Full Cash Value (fourth column from the right), which is about ten times higher, before first multiplying by 10%, and then by 3%.

In other words, the numbers that I gave for the amount of property taxes and the potential increase in the property taxes of 32.4% are correct. Todd House was wrong in his estimate of what the taxes would be and fittingly at the Board of Supervisors meeting he would not guarantee to me that his claim that the taxes would be 1/10 of what I had calculated. It should be clear that the increase in taxes from the proposed district will be substantial and will increase our property taxes by nearly one-third. The grossly incorrect calculations of property taxes suggested by the supporters of PRFR&MD makes me concerned that many other statements by them might also be incorrect.

/s/ Phil Hedrick

Winkelman

Editor’s Note: Copper Area News writer James Hodl used the property tax estimates that were presented to the Pinal County Board of Supervisors by Pinal Rural Fire Rescue because they were part of the official record of the meeting and the impact statement. The group has a year to gather signatures in favor of the new district and it’s voices like Mr. Hedrick’s that will provide counterpoints to the issue. We at Copper Area News appreciate differing viewpoints and invite others to participate in the community discussion. ~JRC

Staff (1509 Posts)

There are news or informational items frequently written by staff or submitted to the Copper Basin News, San Manuel Miner, Superior Sun, Pinal Nugget or Oracle Towne Crier for inclusion in our print or digital products. These items are not credited with an author.


facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather
facebooktwitterby feather

Comments are closed.

  • Stories Just Posted

    Bicyclist killed near Oracle

    18 hours ago
    by

    On Thursday, May 28, 2015, at approximately 6:37 p.m., officers from the Arizona Department of Public Safety were dispatched to […]


    Town of Kearny Survey

    May 27th, 2015
    by

    Town of Kearny residents please drop off your completed surveys with signatures and addresses to the Town sealed, ready for […]


    Summer Reading Program kicks off at Superior Library: Every Hero Has a Story!

    May 26th, 2015
    by

    This summer readers of all ages will celebrate many types of heroes; the heroes of all ages who walk through the doors of the library each day; the heroes who have


    Getting Lost in the Copper Corridor

    May 26th, 2015
    by

    Can you guess where in the Copper Corridor the cover photo was taken? If you guessed Mammoth, then you would be correct.


  • Stories Just For You

    In opposition to the supervisor

    May 26th, 2015
    by

    Mr. Rios,   by your own words to you condemn yourself.   Starting back in early April,  Rios accused me,  in a Letter To The Editor (San Manuel Miner) April 8th. of this yr.


    The Supervisor’s Calendar: the First Quarter of 2015

    May 26th, 2015
    by

    In this letter I would like to provide the constituents of District One a brief description of some of the activities and issues that I participated in the first quarter of


    Supervisors Smith and House enhance political aspirations

    May 19th, 2015
    by

    On Dec. 18, 2014 the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Board denied a request for a zoning regulation amendment requested by the Rose Law Firm to delete the requirement that cultivation


    We know Supervisor Pete Rios

    May 19th, 2015
    by

    This letter is in Reference to Ron Thompson’s letter of last week.  While Supervisor Rios is writing about his successful efforts to acquire funding for meals for our Senior Citizens in the


  • Facebook

  • [Advertisement.]
  • Arizona Headlines & Current Weather